Specification Quality Checklist: OS-Agnostic Test Infrastructure

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-06-13 Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

• [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
• [x] Focused on user value and business needs
• [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
• [x] All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

• [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
• [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
• [x] Success criteria are measurable
• [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
• [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
• [x] Edge cases are identified
• [x] Scope is clearly bounded
• [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

• [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
• [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
• [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
• [x] No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

• The body of the spec (User Scenarios, Requirements, Success Criteria) is intentionally technology-agnostic: it speaks of "container engine", "test framework", and "container-backed tests" rather than naming tools. Concrete tool/version names (Docker 29.x, Testcontainers 2.0.2, JDK 21, JUnit) appear only in the Assumptions section, which by template design records the informed defaults and known constraints that shape — but do not dictate — the eventual implementation. This keeps FR/SC verifiable without implementation knowledge while preserving the migration facts for the planning phase.
• Items marked incomplete require spec updates before /speckit-clarify or /speckit-plan.